2oz amber rum, 8ds allspice dram, 1bsp vanilla liqueur,
4oz hot water, 1tbsp butter, 1tsp cane syrup, several
shooks cinnamon, two cloves
I love hot drink season. There's something so nice about
serving someone a warm drink that's so buttery it's almost a
pastry. One recipe I found called for 1/2tsp butter which is
just comically small. The one major flaw with this mix is that
it puts in all the water first, which makes it too cool by the
time everything's all mixed. If I were to make it again (and I
will!) I'd mix all the liquid ingredients separately, dissolve
the syrup in half the water, mix the two, and then add the
last half of the water to get everything nice and toasty for
serving.
One cocktail book I have advocates for just shoving a red hot
poker into the glass and heating it that way, but I think
that's a little too hardcore for me.
Readers may recall
that at the Seattle Cohost wake, I helped establish a mailing
list—Emerald City Eggbugs—for local COVID-safe events to help
keep the local Cohost community intact and allow it to expand
into something new in its own right. To help kickstart that
process, I've scheduled the inaugural Emerald City Eggbugs
event, a showing of the Wachowskis' 1996 film
Bound
at the Beacon Cinema in
Columbia City.
If you're in Seattle and you want a fun, COVID-safe time with
cool friends, please come join us! Here's the critical
information:
When: 11AM on Sunday the 24th of November Where: The Beacon in Columbia City, 4405
Rainier Ave S. It's about a 15 minute walk from the Angle Lake
station, and the 7, 9, and 50 stop right outside the door RSVP:On Partiful Price: $10 suggested donation to
@nweiz on Venmo. I hope to make this a recurring event, but renting theaters
isn't cheap so this would help me keep it sustainable. But if
$10 is hard on your wallet please come anyway!
NOTAFLOF COVID: Please wear a mask (N95 or better) and
run an over-the-counter test day-of or the night before. If
you can't afford one,
Mask Bloc Seattle
can probably hook you up.
Outsider Comics in
Fremont usually sells them at-cost as well. The theater will
be selling concessions, but we ask that you eat them outdoors
rather than during the film. The theater itself is not a
masks-required space at other times, although we will be the
first event of the day and I've asked the person running the
show to mask and test as well. I'll also be bringing a CR box
to help filter the air while we're there
First, let me lay my cards on the table: I like alcoholic
beverages. I'm not much of a drinker as such—it only takes a
drink or two to get me feeling Done for the night and I very
rarely even hit that limit—but I really enjoy the depth and
breadth of flavor offered by both spirits and cocktails.
They're particularly good at expressing flavor outside the
savory/sugary spectrum that most other comestibles occupy.
Spirits and cocktails are a particular interest of mine, and
that definitely shapes my feelings on this subject to some
degree.
But that's not the heart of my complaint. As someone who makes
a lot of cocktails, I consider it part of my basic hospitality
to have non-alcoholic options available for people who want
them for any reason. And I don't just mean the basics like a
can of soda—I keep a thorough repertoire of non-alcoholic
mixed drinks on hand specifically so I can make
everyone something that feels fancy and tailored to
their palate.
It's from this angle that I mostly approach the category of
"non-alcoholic spirits", and through this lens that I find it
lacking. Part of it is that most of the ones I've
tasted—admittedly not a terribly broad swath—just
aren't very good. They lack textural body and their flavors
are often just a bunch of separate notes that don't come
together into a unified whole. But the heart of what bothers
me is that they're aping alcoholic spirits, and
there's no reason to do that.
In fairness, "no reason" may be overstating my case a bit. I'm
sure there are compelling marketing reasons to describe
something as "non-alcoholic gin" or "zero proof whiskey", but
I don't think it does the product itself any favors. It
simultaneously oversells and undersells the so-called spirit
by standing it up for an impossible comparison while also
failing to say anything about what it actually is. Is
it water, oil, or vinegar based? Is it an infusion, a
decoction, or a percolation? What flavor profile is it
bringing to the table? All of these are critical questions
when actually planning to drink a spirit or mix it in
a cocktail, but they're all overshadowed by the framing as a
"spirit replacement".
A chemical aside: why are non-alcoholic spirits so different?
The experience of drinking a liquid has a lot of sensory
components. There's the texture and even temperature of the
liquid, the "burning" sensation of a high alcohol content, the
flavor on your tongue, and the scents in your nose (which
themselves change over the course of a single sip). The
temperature is pretty easy to control. The alcohol burn is
hard to replicate and debatable whether it's even
worthwhile[1]. But the parts in between—flavor and texture—are more
complicated, and intimately tied to the actual chemistry at
play.
For better or for worse, ethanol (the chemical name for what
we commonly call "alcohol" in beverages) is particularly good
at providing both flavor and texture.…
The Latin phrase et al is short for
et alium, meaning "and garlic", originally used in
recipes to indicate that they should include the baseline
ingredients considered obviously delicious additions to all
foods. It gradually got extended to mean "and the other
obvious additions" in a broader sense, and with this meaning
was adopted into various Romance languages and those
influenced by them, such as English.