went out dancing last night
can't express enough gratitude to normal for girls for hosting masked shows with big ol' cr boxes. had an incredible time. my legs feel like pudding now. dancing in heels is hard work
can't express enough gratitude to normal for girls for hosting masked shows with big ol' cr boxes. had an incredible time. my legs feel like pudding now. dancing in heels is hard work
that one's free for anyone who can make good use of it
I appreciate when manga translations include both transliterations and translations of onomatopoeias. yeah actually I am interested that "gata" is the onomatopoeia for "clatter" that's really cool
"posh ketchup" - Prue Leith, describing tonkatsu sauce
This article is legitimately helpful, but I'm mostly posting it because I find it extremely amusing that (at least as of a year ago) the best-in-class air filter by cost and among the best overall is literally just taping a bunch of filters to a box fan yourself. Hilarious and easy on your wallet! But what's even funnier is Joey's #1 recommendation:
The only thing better than than taping a bunch of filters to a box fan? Taping them to a bunch of PC fans instead! Granted the ones linked here are a little more sophisticated than that, but elsewhere on his site Joey presents one that absolutely is just fans and tape:
it'll turn on automatically if you have it enabled at the OS or browser level. let me know if you notice any issues!
Yuki: π I can't believe you're moving
further away than literally the same apartment complex! This
is the worst thing that's ever happened to me!
Totoko: ππ I wonder if she likes me. I
wonder if she even likes women. No way to know.
Yuki: I just... I like you so much!!!
Totoko: π Just no way to know.
A lot of my friends don't like star ratings for media, and I get it. It's inherently reductive, boiling down your complex and contextual mental-emotional response to a single linear scale that's often taken to approximate some absolute notion of "quality" that probably doesn't even exist in the first place. That's why I always make sure to write down actual textual thoughts about everything I reviewβto have a place to capture the nuance and context that's never going to be visible in a star rating.
At the same time, I always enjoy the intellectual exercise of comparing very different things across the same lines. Back in the day I did yearly "Natto Awards" among all the media I'd journaled that year, and I'd always have a lot of fun doing cross-media categories like "best horror" where movies, video games, and novels were all in competition with one another. It's not particularly fair as a way of determining quality, but that hardly matters when quality is fake anyway. What it does do is get you thinking about what it means to successfully inhabit a genre across media, and what each medium brings to its takes on the same ideas. I find star ratings do something similar, pushing me to really think about how much I appreciate a film or video game and to try to articulate why.
By far the biggest reason I use them all the time, though, is just that my memory for these things is awful. My subconscious is particularly liable to just toss out memories it deems "irrelevant" by its own mysterious criteria, and it turns out that what I thought of a given filmβor even whether I saw it at allβis roundly considered irrelevant. But not to my conscious mind! I actually care a lot about being able to remember how much I enjoyed something long after the fact, and star ratings are a major way I do that.
To that end, I also try to keep a pretty consistent rubric of what each rating means, so I don't shift too much over time. I do inevitably move somewhat and have to self-correct, of course. This post was itself inspired by me realizing that I've been giving out
and to a lesser extent ratings too eagerly. So, as much as a reminder to myself as anything, here's my schema. It's presented as whole-star tiers only; I'll add a half-star if it's particularly enjoyable or well-made relative to its tier.: Corresponds to the "#bad" tag on my old media journal. Actively poorly-made, offensive, and/or otherwise miserable, either with minimal redeeming qualities or simply irredeemably noxious.
: Corresponds to the "#eh" tag on my old media journal. Did not vibe with me. Nothing is egregiously wrong, but nothing is outstandingly right either. Alternatively, there are things I liked about it but somewhat more things I disliked.
posted on www.fourisland.com Solving Puzzles Through Walls, and the No-Wizzies Snipe
On July 18th, I documented my Low% route, including a discovery I'd made. It is possible to snipe Hedges 2 while standing on the top of the mountain. The description of the trick included the following picture and caption:
This statement is false.
It was an understandable assumption to make. There's no reason why that wall needed to have collision coded into it, since it wouldn't be occluding anything in normal gameplay. It's common for game developers to cut corners in places that don't really matter. But it remains an incorrect assumption.
I don't do speedrunning myself, but I find the act fascinating and delightful to watch and especially to learn about. There's an intrinsic human drive, distributed across the entire species, to fractally explore every aspect of the world we live in. It's what drives us to do science, it's what drives us to understand mathematical structures, and it's at least a part of why art speaks to us as strongly as it does. I find speedrunning to be a particularly pure expression of this drive, the progression from enjoying something to wanting to enjoy it to its fullest to diving so deep into it that it expands into a world of its own.
Hatkirby's writeup of the process of discovery and the fallout of one particular trick in The Witness is fascinating and at times hilarious. I recommend giving it a look if only to discover why specifically it's called the "No-Wizzies Snipe". I bet you won't be able to guess.